Post

Dmitry Grigorenko: A decision has been made to establish working groups to eliminate barriers to the development and implementation of AI.

Dmitry Grigorenko: A decision has been made to establish working groups to eliminate barriers to the development and implementation of AI.

Published on: 2026-06-24

Source: Government of the Russian Federation –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

The government subcommittee on the development and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies will form working groups on key issues of AI development. This decision was made at a meeting chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister – Head of the Government Office Dmitry Grigorenko. The working groups will include representatives of the state, business, and the expert community. They will consider the main limitations of artificial intelligence development in Russia and prepare proposals for their elimination.

Working groups are created according to 7 key functional development directions of AI: “Regulation and administrative barriers for AI” (leader – Ivan Lebedev, State Secretary – Deputy Minister of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media); “Infrastructure and data processing centers for AI” (leader – Andrey Belevtsev, Senior Vice President of PJSC “Sberbank”); “Data for AI” (leader – Alexey Shpilman, Director of AI Technology Development at LLC “T-Technologies”); “AI Model Training” (leader – Alexander Kraynov, Director of AI Technology Development at LLC “Yandex”); “Information Security inin the AI sphere (leader – Yuri Maksimov, co-founder of the Cybersecurity Development Fund “Cyberus”); “AI Implementation” (leader – Ildar Ametov, deputy head – head of the Artificial Intelligence Development Center of the Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation”); “AI Support Measures” (leader – Chulpan Gossamova, General Director of the Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “Digital Economy”).

Working groups focus on developing solutions for key issues in the development of artificial intelligence technologies, including ensuring developers’ access to data for training AI models, expanding access to computational resources, and improving the conditions for technological integration. Priority directions also include improving the quality of Russian AI models, optimizing procedures for obtaining government support measures for AI implementation, stimulating demand for domestic solutions, and considering other relevant industry issues.It is assumed that the heads of working groups will regularly present the results of their work at meetings of the government subcommittee.

“Artificial intelligence is one of the most dynamically developing technologies. It opens up new opportunities for the economy, business, and government, but at the same time creates new challenges. Among them is providing developers access to data and computational power, as well as assessing the economic impact of AI implementation. To address these tasks, we are creating working groups with the participation of business representatives and industry experts. Their practical experience and expertise will help develop effective proposals for the further development of AI technologies,” noted Dmitry Grigorenko.

The agenda of the meeting also included the issue of controlling the process of implementing AI technologies in the federal authority. Previously, at the last subcommittee meeting, 197 key performance indicators for the implementation of AI were approved for 13 key industries for 2026. For control and execution in real-time mode, the Government has launched digital monitoring of indicators in the Federal State Information System for Coordination of Informatization (FGIS KI).Departments provide data on task execution for each control point; verification of information is carried out by the Analytical Center under the Government jointly with CECI.

Please note; this information is raw content, obtained directly from the source of information. It represents an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.